Sunday, October 18, 2009

Ma Ying-Jeou is determined to turn Taiwan into Tibet

I add my comments to the AFP report in-place and to the right of the text proper. All emphases are mine.

Taiwan's parliament to ratify China trade pact
TAIPEI — Taiwan's President Ma Ying-jeou said at the weekend that the island's controversial trade pact with China will be subjected to parliamentary
scrutiny before it is ratified.
So, it is controversial.
Taipei insists that the proposed pact will boost the island's annual economic growth by more than one percentage point, but opposition leaders fear it will compromise Taiwan's de facto independence.

In a speech on Saturday after he was formally sworn in as chairman of the ruling Kuomintang party, Ma gave an assurance that all negotiations with Beijing on the "Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement" would be transparent.

His track record says that nothing he says can be believed!

"I promise all these things will be stated clearly. And once it is signed, it will be submitted to parliament for ratification," Ma said.

If this turns to be true, it would be the end of Taiwan, because the KMT legislators will simply rubber-stamp it.

He also gave an assurance that the trade pact "must be what the country needs, supported by the people and placed under supervision of parliament.

He denies people birthrights of referendum and now says it must be supported by the people.

"Therefore, I hereby guarantee that in the future, the government will report to parliament the contents of the pact before it is signed," Ma said.

What does Ma think of people? People do not need to know the content of the pact? Why is it that the content is still never disclosed?

He said Taiwan's people will be given an idea of what the pact's benefits will be, as well as "what negative impacts it may bring to Taiwan."

Why is he hiding the content of ECFA from Taiwanese?

Taiwan's government says the pact will boost the flow of goods and personnel between the island and the mainland and hopes it will be signed early next year.

This is how Taiwan is turned into Tibet!
The opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which favours independence from China, claims it will demote Taiwan to the status of a local government in any talks with the mainland on reunification.

In other words, ECFA turns Taiwan into Tibet!
China and Taiwan split in 1949 after a civil war, but relations have warmed since May last year, when the China-friendly Ma assumed the presidency following the DPP's defeat in general elections.


  • Taiwan did not split from China. Taiwan was not in China's civil war.
  • Relationship got much worst. More Chinese missiles are aiming at Taiwan and Chinese bullying of Taiwan has intensified.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

ECFA will turn Taiwan into Tibet










ECFA just a step to annexing Taiwan

By Lin Kien-tsu 健次

Thursday, Oct 15, 2009, Page 8

After Taiwan and China sign an economic cooperation and framework agreement (ECFA), WTO regulations require that a free-trade agreement (FTA) be signed within 10 years.

In addition to tariff exemptions, an FTA requires the signatories to deregulate their service industries, including the retail, wholesale, food and beverage, tourism, hotel, entertainment, media, bank, insurance, communications, transport, health, education, consulting and brokerage industries. This could give rise to an influx of Chinese service industry manpower in Taiwan.

In short, the signing of an FTA will mean a substantial opening up of Taiwan to the Chinese labor market. In addition to the inflow of Chinese capital, Chinese workers will also flood Taiwan. Taiwan and China will, in practice, move to the
common market stage of economic integration and form a one China common market.

There are four main differences between a common Chinese market and the EU. EU member states recognize each other
s sovereignty, while China sees Taiwan as part of its national territory; EU states have a common defense policy, while China has missiles pointed at Taiwan; key EU member states are of approximate size and no country can monopolize the organization, while China is much bigger than Taiwan and will dominate a common Chinese market; and the EU is made up of democratic states, while China is a dictatorship where the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the government.

After adopting capitalism, the CCP has perpetuated its control of the Chinese government, legislation and judiciary, interferes with markets, leads the distribution of benefits and directs corporations, and then uses corporate control to direct media and public opinion in order to achieve its political goals.

To simplify his rule, the Qin (
) emperor relocated the rich and powerful to undermine their power base. Today, an ECFA and an FTA will push Taiwanese businesspeople to move to China and usher in Chinese capital to Taiwan. These agreements will also introduce significant change, causing a great outflow of Taiwanese labor and a large-scale invasion of Chinese. Chinese and Chinese interest groups in Taiwan are sure to become a force to be reckoned with, and under the CCPs direction, they will become the key force just as they are in Tibet and Xinjiang.

With the power to direct the common Chinese market, it will be easy for China to use its control over businesses to influence the interests of Taiwanese corporations and order around Taiwanese businesspeople, enterprises and media around until they are scared into silence, thus restricting freedom of expression and dissemination of public information. The next step will be to control Taiwan
s elections at all levels and to direct Taiwanese politicians toward emulating Chinas Taiwan policy. This is how they will annex Taiwan without wasting the life of a single soldier.

The main point of the ECFA is not capitalism or the best interests of the working class. ECFA is but another name for the promise of a common Chinese market and one China. It is a contract to sell Taiwan.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

傅雲欽律師: 看荒腔走板的藍綠對抗

Less than a month ago, I wrote

傅雲欽律師: 藍綠惡鬥 不問是非 真是可惡

hoping that 傅雲欽 will stop brainwashing Taiwanese. But he seems to be determined.

It is most regrettable that as a lawyer, 傅雲欽 sees no evil with Taiwan's judicial system. For example:
Our most imminent danger is to be swallowed by China and turned into Tibet. Domestically, our biggest problem is a regime that cannot be held responsible for the people, and constantly stonewalls our demands for transparency and justice. Which side is 傅雲欽 on?

《建國廣場通告》 宣佈獨立是法理台獨的關鍵


傅雲欽 (律師 / 建國廣場負責人) 2009.10.14








1. 毀損罪:洪健益只是將釘住的木板踢開一個縫,好讓手伸進去轉開門的把手,似未毀棄、損壞木板或致令它不堪用,不合毀損罪的成立要件。

2. 侵入建築物罪:此罪的成立,只有「侵入他人的建築物」還不夠,還要處在「無緣無故」的情境才算。也就是說,侵入他人的建築物如有正當理由或原因,即不構成此罪。洪健益在有民眾舉發及兩天前的錄影為證的情形下,基於市議員監督市政府的職責,陪同民視前往查證時,為解釋說明的需要而闖進建築物內,其理由不能說不正當。

3. 加重竊盜罪:車站內的幾張文宣品本來就是供民眾索取的。洪健益的助理自取幾份,應無不可。洪說拿文宣是要作為了解市府施政情形之用,可見並無不法所有的意思。且幾張文宣品的財產價值,其違法性甚低,難以成罪。




民視獨家報導/議員闖貓纜 鬧出「假新聞」風波

自由時報 2009-10-13